Resolved
Pinned fields
Click on the next to a field label to start pinning.
Details
Details
Assignee
Unassigned
UnassignedReporter
Luud Slagter
Luud SlagterClassification
Patch (Z)
Informatiestandaard onderdelen
FHIR-package
Information standard
BgZ 3.x
Fix versions
Priority
Better Excel Exporter
Better Excel Exporter
Created June 30, 2022 at 6:49 AM
Updated January 12, 2024 at 12:54 PM
Resolved August 30, 2022 at 3:13 PM
Currently in the zib-MedicalDeviceRequest profile the element `DeviceRequest.code` has a mapping to NL-CM:10.1.3, which is the ProductType concept in the zib MedicalDevice. This mapping is right if one uses `.codeCodeableConcept`. However, if one would use `.codeReference` instead, the current mapping doesn't make much sense, and in that case a mapping to NL-CM:10.1.2 (the Product container concept in the zib) is much better. Hence this mapping should be added to `.code` as well. Preferably the `.mapping.comment`s should be changed to 'ProductType (for codeableConcept)' and 'Product (for reference)' (or something similar).
Note: since the maximum cardinality of `.code` is 1, it's probably not possible to slice this element and put the mappings on the correct slice (which would be preferable).